Electronic surveillance, spying on citizens, social media and manipulations with the public opinion

Back in 2011, long before today's Russiagate hysteria, it was revealed that the Pentagon creates fake online identities to spread pro-American propaganda. We can only imagine how this has expanded and how much propaganda we're subjected to every day. https://t.co/CvoNGD8uEq

— Dan Cohen (@dancohen3000) 4. října 2018

zerohedge
@zerohedge
5 hod.
Facebook Purges Over 800 Accounts With Millions Of Followers; Prominent Conservatives Vanish

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-11/facebook-purges-over-800-accounts-millions-followers-including-conservative-meme

Alex Rubinstein
@RealAlexRubi
3 hod.
I spoke to 5 people working in independent media affected by today's Facebook purge. These people have put in their hearts, souls, endless energy & even their own cash to make independent media viable in the face of corporate domination only to be censored

https://sputniknews.com/us/201810121068814924-Reporters-Pages-Shut-Down-By-Facebook/

Without warning or explanation, #Facebook just unpublished hundreds of pages including independent media outlets with millions of followers. Make no mistake, this is an extreme act of censoring the truth. #censorship pic.twitter.com/J54bPcmgBA

— MintPress News (@MintPressNews) 12. října 2018

Facebook: Most political trolls are American, not Russian

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/11/facebook-political-trolls-american-not-russian/

Marcel Sardo
@marcelsardo
26. 10.
Everybody concerned about #FreedomOfSpeech should get his act together and READ THIS!

The US military’s vision for state censorship

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/10/05/pers-o05.html

"In March, the United States Special Operations Command, the section of the Defense Department supervising the US Special Forces, held a conference on the theme of “Sovereignty in the Information Age.” The conference brought together Special Forces officers with domestic police forces, including officials from the New York Police Department, and representatives from technology companies such as Microsoft."

...

"Confident that none of the thousands of journalists in Washington will question, or even report, what he writes, Watts (NOTE: Atlatic Council figure) lays out, from the standpoint of the repressive apparatus of the state and the financial oligarchy it defends, why censorship is necessary."

...

"The central theme of the report is “sovereignty,” or the state’s ability to impose its will upon the population. This “sovereignty,” Watts writes, faces “greater challenges now than it ever has in the past,” due to the confluence between growing political opposition to the state and the internet’s ability to quickly spread political dissent."

...

"”Trust in Western society,” he warns, “is experiencing a crisis. The 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer has tracked this erosion, showing a 30 percent drop in trust in government over the last year in the United States.”"

...

"The private sector, therefore, must do the dirty work of the government, because government propaganda is viewed with suspicion by the population. “Business and the private sector may not naturally understand the role they play in combating disinformation, but theirs is one of the most important…. In the West at least, they have been thrust into a central role due to the general public’s increased trust in them as institutions.”"

...

"But this is only the beginning. Online newspapers should “consider disabling commentary systems—the function of allowing the general public to leave comments beneath a particular media item,” while social media companies should “use a grading system akin to that used to rate the cleanliness of restaurants” to rate their users’ political statements."

...

MORE HERE:

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/10/05/pers-o05.html


Btw, this is exactly what we discussed earlier. Private corporations/Big Tech companies, masquaraded as private entities, do (and will do) political agenda of the globalist establishment which pretends full complainment with "freedom of speech/democracy" standards.

Contrary to Atlantic Council's claim (which could be just poor attempt of distraction) I tend to believe that Internet was introduced to the public exactly because it offers opportunity to gain ability to control public opinion in large. They intorduced free platform for sharing informations, attracted 100s of million of users, created problem and now they are going to shape public opinions globaly. They have tool in their hands that no other dictratorship and oppresive regime had before. Dangerous times...

France and Facebook announce partnership against online hate speech

"As part of the cooperation — the first time that Facebook has teamed up with national politicians to hammer out such a contentious issue — both sides plan to meet regularly between now and May, when the European election is due to be held. They will focus on how the French government and Facebook can work together to remove harmful content from across the digital platform, without specifying the outcome of their work or if it would result in binding regulation."

https://www.politico.eu/article/emmanuel-macron-mark-zuckberg-paris-hate-speech-igf/


vanessa beeley‏ @VanessaBeeley · 1 hod.
"Freedom of speech, thought, mind" will soon be a thing of the past that we remember fondly when we are no longer able to express our distaste about the criminal actions of those who will silence us. Time to wake up.

Tell me more about how these Silicon Valley corporations are completely separate from government power so their censorship is nothing like government censorship. https://t.co/5HGHdSWM5r

— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) 14. listopadu 2018

Crucifying Julian Assange

"Julian Assange’s sanctuary in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London has been transformed into a little shop of horrors. He has been largely cut off from communicating with the outside world for the last seven months. His Ecuadorian citizenship, granted to him as an asylum seeker, is in the process of being revoked. His health is failing. He is being denied medical care. His efforts for legal redress have been crippled by the gag rules, including Ecuadorian orders that he cannot make public his conditions inside the embassy in fighting revocation of his Ecuadorian citizenship."

...

"WikiLeaks and Assange have done more to expose the dark machinations and crimes of the American Empire than any other news organization. Assange, in addition to exposing atrocities and crimes committed by the United States military in our endless wars and revealing the inner workings of the Clinton campaign, made public the hacking tools used by the CIA and the National Security Agency, their surveillance programs and their interference in foreign elections, including in the French elections. He disclosed the conspiracy against British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn by Labour members of Parliament. And WikiLeaks worked swiftly to save Edward Snowden, who exposed the wholesale surveillance of the American public by the government, from extradition to the United States by helping him flee from Hong Kong to Moscow. The Snowden leaks also revealed, ominously, that Assange was on a U.S. “manhunt target list.”"

More here:

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/crucifying-julian-assange/


Sarah Abdallah‏ @sahouraxo · 20 hod.
“The Clinton Foundation received millions from Saudi Arabia & Qatar, two of the major funders of ISIS. Hillary Clinton paid her donors back by approving $80 billion in weapons sales to Saudi Arabia, enabling Riyadh to carry out a devastating war in Yemen.”

Belle Lin‏ @bellelin_ · 43 min.
Alexa wants to figure out where you’re from by listening to your accent. If it does, the government is interested too, and ads could get a lot more creepy.




Amazon’s Accent Recognition Technology Could Tell the Government Where You’re From

https://theintercept.com/2018/11/15/amazon-echo-voice-recognition-accents-alexa/

global 5G network … will introduce mass surveillance and widespread control if it is allowed to dominate 5G networks linking billions of Internet of Things (IoT)-connected devices … be able "to weaponize cities, … "Think of self-driving cars that suddenly mow down unsuspecting pedestrians. Think of drones that fly into the intakes of airliners," stated US General Robert Spalding (retired), a former Trump administration official, who served in National Security Council
https://sputniknews.com/science/201901061071248722-china-weaponizing-5g-network/?utm_source=https://t.co/zXQVuGpaFp&utm_medium=short_url&utm_content=kyc4&utm_campaign=URL_shortening

Little he realizes to have revealed what is the U.S. doing with all the 5G in the world, what a moron

'Public will know': Seehofer to disclose how German officials' data was hacked http://sptnkne.ws/kywe

Creation of domestic software isn't self-isolation, but protection of interests of citizens, business - Medvedev
Interfax

Max Blumenthal‏@MaxBlumenthal · 55 min.
Newsguard is a tool of mass suppression aimed directly at alternative media. Ex-DHS Director Tom Ridge - creator of the post-9/11 feamongering color code terror alerts - is on its board. No surprise Newsguard plans to assign dissenting outlets with red color codes & de-rank them.

Here's How NeoCon-Backed “Fact Checker” @NewsGuardRating Plans to Wage War on Independent Media -> https://t.co/ftH6QnVlDn pic.twitter.com/3N8eevZqoY

— MintPress News (@MintPressNews) 14. ledna 2019

Max Blumenthal‏@MaxBlumenthal · 53 min
Here’s another board member of the Newsguard media suppression initiative: self-described former State Department “chief propagandist” Richard Stengel, who in this clip defends governments propagandizing their own citizens.

At a Council on Foreign Relations forum about "fake news," former Editor at Time Magazine Richard Stengel directly states that he supports the use of propaganda on American citizens - then shuts the session down when challenged about how propaganda is used against the third world pic.twitter.com/ClAT5POv7G

— William Craddick (@williamcraddick) 11. května 2018

How a NeoCon-Backed “Fact Checker” Plans to Wage War on Independent Media

"As Newsguard’s project advances, it will soon become almost impossible to avoid this neocon-approved news site’s ranking systems on any technological device sold in the United States."

https://www.mintpressnews.com/newsguardneocon-backed-fact-checker-plans-to-wage-war-on-independent-media/253687/

STATE DUMA PASSES AT FIRST READING BILLS ON FINES FOR DISSEMINATION OF PUBLICLY SIGNIFICANT FAKE NEWS
01/24 13:48 RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS CAN BE RESTRICTED FOR CONSTITUTIONALLY SIGNIFICANT PURPOSES - RUSSIAN PRESIDENTIAL ENVOY TO STATE DUMA IN REGARD OF DEBATE OF BILLS ON FAKE NEWS
Interfax

Suspect 'PropOrNot ID Service' Recieves "funding from" The Global Engagement Center' https://t.co/QvtS7qy6BI (@StateDept) As Per The 'Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act' https://t.co/CtzZN7PeNK Which #LegalizedLying; Foreign & DOMESTIC! Timelines Are Similar! pic.twitter.com/IFLNr4NQQo

— Mr. NoahItALL! (@MrNoahItALL) 25. ledna 2019

It's obvious who is pushing Newsguard. I told them NO!
Yet the Federal Reserve, AIPAC and ADL aren't considered foreign?

From the science thread:

Slovák wrote:
Scientists have been able to turn brain signals into words
Accuracy was amazing - 75 percent.
https://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=3111015&cid=7

FoShizzle wrote:
That's really cool, actually.  However, my paranoia reigns supreme.  

Another wave of Facebook censorship unleashed:

Facebook has suspended without explanation a number of @RT_com -related accounts, in particular @AnissaNow’s @IntheNow_tweet project that had a total of million subscribers

https://t.co/dwqLGvSdIm pic.twitter.com/gk3GnF5sDa

— MFA Russia(@mfa_russia) 19. února 2019

"The US continues down the path of strict censorship and restrictions on freedom of speech on the internet. Today, we learned that Facebook has suspended without explanation a number of RT-related accounts, in particular Anissa Naouai’s In the Now project that had a total of 4 million subscribers."

http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/3524466

Emmanuel Macron has floated the idea that those convicted for crimes of "hate speech" could be banned from social media networks permanently.. A new bill to fight against "hate speech" online was being tabled for May of this year..

The proposal to stifle speech online comes as President Macron faces unprecedented levels of criticism from the anti-government Yellow Vest movement. The French state has cracked down hard on Yellow Vest activists, arresting 8,400 protestors in just a matter of months.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/02/22/macron-france-could-ban-hate-speech-convicts-from-all-social-media-for-life/

As Macron made it clear the other day, criticism of the Zionist state now means anti-semitism = hate speech

QualComm founder a fan long before ‘Start-Up Nation’

"Irwin M. Jacobs prides himself on being one of the first US entrepreneurs to discover what Israel could do for multinationals"

...

"Among the technologies developed by QualComm Israel are the company’s m2m (machine to machine) cellular platform, which is used to track the location of pets, kids, the elderly, and property, a spokesperson said. It’s part of QualComm’s attempt to create an “Internet of Everything,” where objects are intelligently connected through a combination of advanced wireless networks.."

"QualComm has also acquired several Israeli companies. In 2010, the company bought iSkoot, which develops social media apps for AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, among others."

https://www.timesofisrael.com/qualcomm-founder-a-fan-long-before-start-up-nation/

It's more than interesting that the company, that attempts to create "Internet of Everything" (in other words tries to develope system to tag and spy on everything from pets to the human beings) closely cooperates with big tech companies as named Verizon or AT&T. Such giants benefited largerly from the Tump's steps against net neutrality. Such companies are knwon, among others, for their close cooperation with government and its institutions, namely with the NSA, for example...


The Wiretap Rooms

The NSA’s Hidden Spy Hubs in Eight U.S. Cities

https://theintercept.com/2018/06/25/att-internet-nsa-spy-hubs/

PESKOV: HUGE NUMBER OF CYBERATTACKS AGAINST VARIOUS RUSSIAN ORGANIZATIONS CONSTANTLY CARRIED OUT FROM U.S. TERRITORY
Interfax

FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP by Alexander Rubinstein

https://www.mintpressnews.com/how-a-small-team-of-journalists-overcame-neocon-cheered-facebook-censorship/255789/#

March 01st, 2019


How a Small Team of Journalists Overcame Neocon-Cheered Facebook Censorship
“CNN manufactured a story: They investigated us, then got Facebook to censor us due to our funding source and then boom, they had a story about a Russian-funded outlet getting banned by Facebook.” — In The Now host Rania Khalek


ENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA — Facebook seemed to have outdone itself again in its ongoing suppression of independent media when, earlier this month in coordination with CNN, it banned four pages belonging to a company that was not even accused of breaking any of the platform’s rules.

The genesis of In The Now’s ban is striking as it has never concealed its funding and it had been reported on years ago. Nonetheless, a U.S. government-funded neoconservative think tank saw a problem with In The Now and partnered with CNN to expose it. CNN identified the owners of In The Now to Facebook and used yet another neoconservative think tank, which has been partnering closely with Facebook for the past few years, to scaremonger in its article about Russian meddling in American politics.

Now, Facebook is reversing its decision following outcry from the public.




Facebook’s advertising ban against RT — which was accused in a January 2017 Office of the Director of National Intelligence report of seeking to sow “radical discontent” in the United States during the presidential election, including with TV shows that did not air during the race — became a powder keg, leading to a new era of heightened hostilities in the U.S. establishment’s social-media information war. The measly 12-page document gave tech giants like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter carte blanche justification to intervene against alternative media publications that were growing in popularity on their platform.

What followed has been a series of carpet bombings against “coordinated inauthentic behavior” and precision strikes against independent outlets like The Free Thought Project and The Anti-Media, and conspiracy showman Alex Jones’ InfoWars. In those cases, however, Facebook has accused the outlets of crossing red lines as a pretext for the bans.

In the Now, a small viral-video unit, and three of its offshoots, all owned by a company called Maffick, however, were not even accused of a red line before they were sent to Facebook prison in mid-February. Earlier this week, the pages were set free and allowed to continue promoting their journalists’ material on Facebook.

When CNN broke the story of the ban, they even admitted that it was an “unusual” step, writing:

The move was an unusual one for Facebook. The company does not require users to provide information about parent companies, but it is rolling out ways to try to increase transparency about who runs popular Facebook pages, and it has been taking aggressive steps to tackle covert government-backed information operations on its service.”

While In the Now’s Rania Khalek, in interviews with MintPress News, characterized the Facebook ban as discriminatory against an outlet for its affiliation with RT, In the Now’s production is cutting edge, a rarity for its brand of anti-establishment reporting. The videos take a nod from a style popularized by the Qatar-owned AJ+, with hosts talking about the news with a critical, progressive angle, animated text, quick cuts and b-roll.

In contrast to similar video shops like AJ+ and Now This News, which give a progressive spin on domestic issues in the U.S., In the Now under Khalek and other hosts, like the previous iteration of the show under RT, has taken up anti-imperialist causes and has been critical of media hysteria around Russiagate. The host of the RT program, American journalist Anissa Naouai, went on to become the CEO of Maffick.

Of Maffick’s other outlets, Soapbox voices similar criticisms of empire, while BackThen takes a similar look at history, and its Waste-Ed focuses on environmental issues.

Since the January 2017 ODNI report, Facebook’s ban reversal on Maffick’s outlets has been one of the few victories for alternative media in the fight against mounting censorship online. Therefore, both how the ban came to fruition, how Maffick fought it, and where we go next are all worth examining.




CNN colluded with USAID-funded think tank
“CNN was digging around for dirt on Maffick, the holding company for In The Now,” Khalek told MintPress News. “Some of CNN’s correspondents were contacting freelance employees in LA, asking them about the company,” she said. Questions like “if they had anything negative to say, if the Russian government dictates our stories, etc.” Khalek continued:

Eventually this got back to us and we contacted CNN and offered to give them access to us by giving them an interview. Drew Griffin, the lead reporter on the story, interviewed me and J Ray Sparks, the COO of Maffick. It actually felt more like a police interrogation, it lasted 45 minutes and the questions were incredibly invasive about our business structure. We were totally open about who funds us and about the fact that we have editorial control over the content.”

CNN even sent reporters to the homes of “people who work with us,” according to Naouai.

Griffin’s style of interrogation was previously laid bare by an absurd confrontation he had with an elderly woman named Florine Gruen Goldfarb outside of her home in February 2018. The grilling, captured in a video which is less than two minutes long, is one of the more bizarre data points in a saga that has included allegations that Russia used coloring books featuring a buff Bernie Sanders, hired 12 trolls to pose as a hacker that exchanged naked photographs with a former James Bond actress, and memes about masturbating with Jesus, in its quest to sow discord in the United States.

I can't stop watching this pic.twitter.com/vpqXlmLOJA

— Alex Rubinstein (@RealAlexRubi) 21. února 2018

CNN admitted in its article that it was tipped off by the German Marshall Fund to the fact that Maffick is owned by Ruptly, an RT subsidiary (51 percent), and by Naouai (49 percent). The think tank is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Readers of MintPress News may be familiar with the dark history and cynical ambitions of the State Department’s “humanitarian” agency USAID. The German Marshall Fund, for its part, is among a handful of think tanks working overtime to combat supposed “disinformation” online.




The final version of the interview was published on CNN. But — as Kevin Gosztola, Shadowproof managing editor and co-host of a podcast with Khalek, noted — several discrepancies exist between CNN’s initial account of what happened and what can be heard in an unedited recording of the interview. Maffick COO Sparks was misquoted by CNN “twice,” Gosztola pointed out. Following the Shadowproof report, CNN issued a correction.




“Just the beginning”
Following an 800-page purge on Facebook in October 2018 that included independent media outlets with millions of followers like The Free Thought Project and The Anti-Media, German Marshall Fund senior fellow Jamie Fly told journalist Jeb Sprague with the Grayzone that they were “just starting to push back. Just this last week Facebook began starting to take down sites. So this is just the beginning.”

As MintPress News recently reported, Fly was a protege of neoconservative grandaddy Bill Kristol and was a member of his old think tank, the Foreign Policy Initiative. Later, Fly would oversee the German Marshall Fund’s Alliance for Securing Democracy, a project in which Kristol was also involved. The group, as MintPress News reported, played a critical role in hyping up the threat in the media of “Russian bots” following the 2016 election with its fake troll tracker the Hamilton 68 Dashboard.

Months after the October purge, the German Marshall Fund seems to have began targeting Maffick. German Marshall Fund social-media analyst Bret Shafer stated, “It should be clearly labeled” and “when they don’t label them, they need to be called out on that.”

In a press release, Maffick had the following to say:

None of The German Marshall Fund’s financial backers are displayed on their own Facebook Page. [Yet] CNN continued to pursue a conspiratorial narrative, seeking and finding support from NATO member-based think tank The German Marshall Fund, ironically financed through a consortium of public-private entities led by government-owned German banking giant KfW.

CNN’s Drew Griffin interviewed recent intern with the U.S. State Department in Moscow Bret Schafer, who assured for the camera, ‘Oh they’re definitely state funded, I mean, you can pull the German registration data,’ conveniently restating facts of which CNN had already been informed in writing by Maffick themselves. Thus CNN engineered the false impression that there was potentially a sensational new Russian secret, perhaps even one Facebook should fear and one on which it should urgently take action.”

CNN also sought the expertise of serial smear artist Ben Nimmo of the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensics Research Laboratory (DFRL). The Atlantic Council is funded by NATO, gulf monarchies and defense contractors, while its DFRL branch has partnered with Facebook in its bid to “identify” and “expose” supposed “disinformation” on its platform. As journalists Max Blumenthal and Jeb Sprague noted:

[Nimmo] embarked on an embarrassing witch hunt this year that saw him misidentify several living, breathing individuals as Russian bots or Kremlin ‘influence accounts.’ Nimmo’s victims included Mariam Susli, a well-known Syrian-Australian social media personality, the famed Ukrainian concert pianist Valentina Lisitsa, and a British pensioner named Ian Shilling.”

In potentially one of the most bizarre interviews on mainstream media in 2018, you can watch mainstream media hosts with Sky News ask Shilling whether he is really a “Russian bot.”





Indirect government censorship
After CNN contacted Facebook, and even though Facebook found no rulebreaking on Maffick’s part, the social-media behemoth banned the pages. It was only then that CNN had found a news peg worthy of publishing its story, which had four CNN reporters signed onto it. Khalek told MintPress News:

Basically CNN manufactured a story: They investigated us, then got Facebook to censor us due to our funding source and then boom, they had a story about a Russian-funded outlet getting banned by Facebook. And the fact that they did it at the behest of a U.S. government-funded outfit makes it even more alarming, because it means the U.S. government is using intermediaries to censor content it doesn’t like, in this case videos that challenge destructive U.S. government policies related to war and corporations.”

Discussing the piece on-air, CNN’s reporters didn’t exactly tout their investigative accomplishment. One of the reporters on the story, Donnie O’Sullivan, told CNN’s Brian Stelter, “Look, as much as I’d like to say we did a ton of digging on this, if you were to, you know, start googling these pages, you could quickly sort of work it back.”

Embedded video

J

Investigation finds Russia is paying to produce viral videos aimed at Americans

--@Donie on with @BrianStelter https://t.co/QaV044KxTw pic.twitter.com/HxVFnXQacA

— Josh Campbell (@joshscampbell) 17. února 2019

As to the content, O’Sullivan said, “You watch these videos; a lot of the points they are making are points that will resonate with real Americans, but we know that is what RT does.”

In a statement, Maffick said:

The problem with Facebook’s response to CNN’s narrative is that it singles out Russian publicly funded media while falling short of publishing a clear public policy that would apply to a long list of other media Pages on Facebook. Facebook policies currently make such disclosure voluntary and few if any of the scores of publicly financed media outlets do so on their Facebook Pages.

Maffick’s public media industry peers, such as AJ+, BBC, CBC and others, have remained online throughout Facebook’s blackout of Maffick. By singling out Russia, especially the type of mainstream human-interest content produced by Maffick, Facebook risks setting a dangerous precedent on censorship that could inadvertently reinforce the xenophobic paranoia surrounding the controversy over alleged Russian involvement in U.S. politics.”



Towards a fair, consistent, comprehensive policy
While Facebook has lifted the ban on In the Now, the page contains a disclaimer about the funding of the parent organization. Facebook has offered wishy-washy responses as to whether other pages will be forced to make similar disclosures — telling Maffick, “It’s possible that’s there’s no other page” that will be made to but that it was also in the process of rolling out the policy.

In the interim, Maffick is calling on Facebook to be more transparent, stating in its press release:

Facebook needs to publish policy that comprehensively applies to all businesses that are more than ten percent financed, either directly or indirectly, by any type of government funding, be it via direct tax, mandatory media fees or other transactional devices.

Americans and media consumers across the rest of the world deserve to have full transparency regarding who pays for the relentless stream of content with which they are daily presented. If they single out Russia, in the case of Maffick, Facebook will become political activists in the way they choose to selectively apply such policies, now and in the future.”

Khalek added:

While it’s important that Facebook put our pages back up, they should release a clear policy about funding disclosures that applies to everyone. So far In The Now is being singled out. No other outlet that receives government funding is being required by Facebook to disclose it on their page. As it stands now, this behavior is discriminatory.”

Despite the victory for In The Now, Khalek thinks that the “conversation should be expanded to include corporate media outlets. It’s important that consumers know the forces funding the media they are consuming and that includes corporate forces, not just governments.” As MintPress News explored in its three-part investigation into eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, billionaires are able to leverage their cash to prop up scores of media outlets — an issue that has been ignored in the hysteria that the threat of fake news has spawned. In Omidyar’s case, experts believe one of his outlets has even withheld from publication documents that could hurt eBay.

Top Photo | A screenshot from a video published on the Soapbox Facebook page shows hosts Anissa Naouai (left) and Rania Khalek (right).  Editing by MintPress News

Alexander Rubinstein is a staff writer for MintPress News based in Washington, DC. He reports on police, prisons and protests in the United States and the United States’ policing of the world. He previously reported for RT and Sputnik News.