Re: #32 - Main news thread - conflicts, terrorism, crisis from around the globe

[Böhse Tante]

Carl Zha‏ @CarlZha · 54 min
“I hope Hong Kong can have a happy ending just like Ukraine”

Young Hong Kong woman after viewing “Winter on Fire” Maidan documentary organized by protesters

They should show them what happened in Odessa and then ask again. When I think of all those youngsters with such a lot of BS in their heads I want to leave the planet. But it's not bc of my age, my daughter says the same, that most younger people are dumbasses - yeah, but most of the older people too.

[Böhse Tante]

Swedish Behavioral Scientist Suggests Eating Humans To "Save The Planet" https://t.co/MWUTT6IgPb

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 6, 2019

So why he doesn't jump as the first one into the meat grinder.

[Böhse Tante]

US Ambassador Richard Grenell demands German government ban Hezbollah
https://www.dw.com/en/germany-needs-to-ban-hezbollah-us-ambassador-grenell-says/a-50320893



The German government has argued that recognizing Hezbollah as a legitimate part of Lebanon's government is necessary for political engagement with the Middle Eastern country.

Grenell has rejected this assertion and said the US, Great Britain and the Netherlands all have strong ties with Lebanon, despite having banned Hezbollah.
"Lebanon receives more development aid than any other country in the world. But at the same time, we remain true to our principles and classify Hezbollah as what it is: a terror organization."

It was unclear how Grenell established the value of US development aid
since several countries, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Tanzania, South Sudan, Ethiopia and Jordan, received more economic aid from the United States than Lebanon, according to 2017 figures from USAID.

Please do not show this fuckface. As you can see, he's talking out of his fat ass, he has no clue. Put a little "Schnauzbart" on his upper lips and he looks like the man from Austria we had here.

[KneelB4Zod!]

considering your discussion about rothschilds and rockefellers. i do not think you are aware of event that took place in 2012:

Is The End Nigh: Rockefellers And Rothschilds Merge

You know its bad when... two of the largest and best-known 'familia' in Europe and the US come together. As the FT reports, The Rockefellers and The Rothschilds are uniting under a common group as Rothschild Investment Trust and Rockefeller Financial Services become one. The patriarchs (David Rockefeller 96, and Lord Rothschild 76) have been 'connected' for five decades. Between the Rothschild's 'sprawling' multi-century banking empire across Europe and the Rockefeller's roots in 1882 Oil-money, we can only imagine the Illuminati, Freemasons, Templars, and Central Bankers of the world are quaking in their boots at this new global force for change - The Rothsellers or is it The Rockchilds. What next? It seems only Soros is left to complete the holy trinity...

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/end-nigh-rockefellers-and-rothschilds-merge

they are not going against each other and they are neither trying to get control of their own dominions. they merged..in 2012. there is something else going on. and that something is big enough for them to join forces. and they are still losing control rapidly.

now. please continue with speculation.

This is why I tend to use Amero-centric and Euro-centric. I think it quite well describes current situation.

I think all of this division and related events within globalist structures is linked to the failed attempt to balkanize Russia.
It was meant as "peaceful" breakup of the country and foollowing seizure of Russian wealth. Unnexpectedly, Russiarised again and recovered significantly after terrible Yeltsin's era.
Then, for Amerocentrist better option was to go to open confrontation with Russia and sacrfice all the Europe. For Eurocentrists it was, actually, not so atractive. Then division started.

[Zambeezi]

Swedish Behavioral Scientist Suggests Eating Humans To "Save The Planet" https://t.co/MWUTT6IgPb

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 6, 2019

So why he doesn't jump as the first one into the meat grinder.

[Talos]

Mark Esper and the new defense chief in UK seem to be far less anti Iran than all the other people in their goverments.

[Talos]

H.K ‏@Ibra_Joudeh · 1 min.
Syrian Army, SDF reach agreement to open new crossing in Euphrates region

I do not trust the SDF it could be a way for SDF to send Isis fighters to attack across the Euphrates or for US to attack the Abu Kamal crossing in the future.

[KneelB4Zod!]

By @RT_com
"#USA rouge behavior now includes piracy, bribery & blackmail' - Zarifhttps://t.co/1xcDU2w9j9

— Filomena Rocha (@Filomen03258997) September 6, 2019

[Talos]

It looks like Syria paid Iran in US dollars for the oil dollars they captured from US backed rebels lol.

[anon0]

This is why I tend to use Amero-centric and Euro-centric. I think it quite well describes current situation.

as you can see interests behind TPTB are the same. they merge in 2012. there is no Amero-centric and Euro-centric divide. it is the same interests.

I think all of this division and related events within globalist structures is linked to the failed attempt to balkanize Russia.
It was meant as "peaceful" breakup of the country and foollowing seizure of Russian wealth. Unnexpectedly, Russia rised again and recovered significantly after terrible Yeltsin's era.

i do not think that was the case. putin was i little less of the puppet but he was never the less part of the "club". disagrement started not because of putin but because of hard line russian nationalists that seized the opportunity in ukraine to take action. as you have followed situation in libya in the time when gadddafi was disposed you are well aware that russia (and china) never did anything other that diplomatic protests. and all involved were well aware that diplomatic protests are green light for TPTB to proceed with their actions. russia became the target after ukraine situation got out of hand (new russia). and this whole situation with new russia was not planned in advance by russian side. it was pure improvisation. BTW what is going on with strelkov ? anybody knows ? he was sent to moscow and then assassinations in new russia started to heat up.

Anyhow..putin was making deals with TPTB





and he appointed people in top of government who were continuing with economic polices of TPTB (for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Gref = but then came economic crises of 2008 and putin decided to remove them and take another road with economy. then came situation in libya when putin understood that he is next (after syria and iran) and that made him change his attitude to TPTB. it was not voluntary and it was not because of his will to do it. it was for his personal survival. i guess he did not want to be anally raped as gaddafi.

Then, for Amerocentrist better option was to go to open confrontation with Russia and sacrfice all the Europe. For Eurocentrists it was, actually, not so atractive. Then division started.

I think their plans whent to shit. and now they are making them along....they have some kind of idea what they want but plans they were developing for generations went to shit. and it was not because of putin or china. russia (and putin) understood what is going on in full extent only at the time when situation in ukraine was developing. russians are also improvising...are they are pretty good at it. but they are also improvising.

also, Hi everbody.

I am here from beginning. it is nice place with great information. there is something strange going on on GLP. there is always something strange on GLP but something is happening with trinity. i would say that he finally understood that he is expendable.

[Talos]

RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, ,NORTH KOREA, VENEZUELA SYRIA AND CUBA SUPPORT EACH OTHER IN FIGHT AGAINST U.S. SANCTIONS.

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-china-iran-fight-sanctions-1458096

They can add Iraq, Serbia, Belarus, Turkey, Lebanon, Bolivia and Nicaragua to that list.

I called it years ago what can the US do if Iran sells oil to Syria or North Korea? They have already sanctioned them all and what can they do if Cuba sends cancer drugs to Iran or Venezuela? Put the same sanctions they have already put on? The US policy of sanctions is backfiring as there are now about 20 to 30 countries all sanctioned by the US that are now all trading amongst each other and setting up a different financial system to the one controlled by the US.

[KneelB4Zod!]

This is why I tend to use Amero-centric and Euro-centric. I think it quite well describes current situation.

as you can see interests behind TPTB are the same. they merge in 2012. there is no Amero-centric and Euro-centric divide. it is the same interests.

I think all of this division and related events within globalist structures is linked to the failed attempt to balkanize Russia.
It was meant as "peaceful" breakup of the country and foollowing seizure of Russian wealth. Unnexpectedly, Russia rised again and recovered significantly after terrible Yeltsin's era.

i do not think that was the case. putin was i little less of the puppet but he was never the less part of the "club". disagrement started not because of putin but because of hard line russian nationalists that seized the opportunity in ukraine to take action. as you have followed situation in libya in the time when gadddafi was disposed you are well aware that russia (and china) never did anything other that diplomatic protests. and all involved were well aware that diplomatic protests are green light for TPTB to proceed with their actions. russia became the target after ukraine situation got out of hand (new russia). and this whole situation with new russia was not planned in advance by russian side. it was pure improvisation. BTW what is going on with strelkov ? anybody knows ? he was sent to moscow and then assassinations in new russia started to heat up.

Anyhow..putin was making deals with TPTB





and he appointed people in top of government who were continuing with economic polices of TPTB (for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Gref = but then came economic crises of  2008 and putin decided to remove them and take another road with economy. then came situation in libya  when putin understood that he is next (after syria and iran) and that made him change his attitude to TPTB. it was not voluntary and it was not because of his will to do it. it was for his personal survival. i guess he did not want to be anally raped as gaddafi.

Then, for Amerocentrist better option was to go to open confrontation with Russia and sacrfice all the Europe. For Eurocentrists it was, actually, not so atractive. Then division started.

I think their plans whent to shit. and now they are making them along....they have some kind of idea what they want but plans they were developing for generations went to shit. and it was not because of putin or china. russia (and putin) understood what is going on in full extent only at the time when situation in ukraine was developing. russians are also improvising...are they are pretty good at it. but they are also improvising.

also, Hi everbody.

I am here from beginning. it is nice place with great information. there is something strange going on on GLP. there is always something strange on GLP but something is happening with trinity. i would say that he finally understood that he is expendable.

Welcome here and I'm glad you find informations here interesting.



Regarding your post - I can't agree much. Some people think that Putin is just another globalist who works together with the others etc. I don't see any logic behind such atitude.
I don't want to start historic lessons but I think it's needed to explain why I do not follow such atitude. So I'll try to summarise it quickly:

After collapse of USSR terrible Yeltsin's era started. He was utter fool, boozer and overall idiot. It was exactly the kind of stooge the globalists needed. Under his government all levels of Russian economy and businesses were infiltrated by globalist collaborators (later known as oligarchs), and everything possible was done to take over Russian wealth and funnel everything outside the country amid ongoing attempt to balkanize the country. See "Bush family project Hammer" from Deanna Spingola.

Then the time has come to find Yeltsin's successor. Putin rised straight from the pro-globalist group within Kremlin. Group known as "Kremlin Family". One of the oligarchs, later one of the biggest Putin's enemies, Boris Berezovsky, even runt Putin's election campaign on his private TV ORT (at least I think it was the TV's name). It occured that the campaign was very successful and Putin won the election. He was meant as candidate, who will hammer final nails to the coffin of Russia and make it collapse. Instead, the very first thing he've done was change of constitution and, immediately, he started to deal with oligarchs, who worked for the globalists abroad. Immediately this made him dictator, usurper and tyrant in the eyes of western corporate media and governments. Shortly after the globalists recognized that they chose the wrong man they launched backup plan and brought down Twin Towers as pretext to finish Russia by spreading military power across the globe. Then Afghanistan came, Irak and Libya.

Back then there was really little to none for Russia what could be done except diplomatic meanings. Let's not forget - in none of the named countries Russia had it's military bases and Iraq came only 3 years after Yeltsin's era was gone. Russian economy was almost done. So was army. An d let's not forged western supported conflict hotposts in Caucasus for example. Putin cleverly decided to use the tim to make Russia recovered. So Rusdsian economy largerly recovered as well as army. Powerty in Russia was lower than in the US back in 2014. And, since 2011 russia backed Syrian government against western backed terrorists. And, when time has come, Putin intervened and overturned this globalist gamble and gave them lesson never seen before.

From all of above I can assume that there is no reason to think Putin is, or ever was, a part of the globalist mafia. Except the very begining of his political career when he was mistaknely considered as one of the globalist collaboraters within Kremlin.

Regarding Amero or Euro centrists - yep, their goal is same but they have different approach and, after all, even different vission of the final version of NWO. So this is why the division exists. And it's pretty vissible I think. Let's start with Amero-centrist tariffs on Euro-centrists and and with different approach regarding Iran.

So that's my opinon and it's basis.

[KneelB4Zod!]

Al-Masdar News
@TheArabSource
·
48 s
Breaking: Intense clashes breakout for second straight night in northern #Syria https://aml.ink/CmBiF #Aleppo

[anon0]

Then the time has come to find Yeltsin's successor. Putin rised straight from the pro-globalist group within Kremlin. Group known as "Kremlin Family". One of the oligarchs, later one of the biggest Putin's enemies, Boris Berezovsky, even runt Putin's election campaign on his private TV ORT (at least I think it was the TV's name). It occured that the campaign was very successful and Putin won the election.

they (Berezovsky, and putin) had disagreements how to share money. not disagreements about politics.

But, let us go back in time to Dec 31, 1999

Yeltsin's Resignation Speech with English Subtitles



Why ? Why did he resigned ?

Who put putin in place to became prime minister and then after yeltsin resignation to become president of russia ?

He was meant as candidate, who will hammer final nails to the coffin of Russia and make it collapse. Instead, the very first thing he've done was change of constitution and, immediately, he started to deal with oligarchs, who worked for the globalists abroad. Immediately this made him dictator, usurper and tyrant in the eyes of western corporate media and governments.

by whome he was created as candidate ? who had enough power to put him in that position ? who had enough power to force Berezovsky to provide propaganda ? who had enough power to force yeltsin to resign ? who had enough power to promise (and keep promise) to yeltsin that he will not be punished ? who had enough power (and influance) to keep Sobchak out of prison ? (In May 1990, Putin was appointed Mayor Sobchak's advisor on international affairs)

you see, russia is big and old country. putin was not some person who got lucky time and the time again and just had what it takes to become president of russia. somebody was taking care of his career and somebody put him in positions that helped him to become president of russia. TPTB do not have that kind of influence in russia.

putin was not supposed to be a president of russia in plans of TPTB. somebody (or group of people) forced yeltsin to resign and put putin on his place. there was no particular reason why yeltsin had to resign. it was not because of health issues. he died in 2007. why did he resign ? his resignation was great surprise to everybody in russia.

In May 1990, Putin was appointed Mayor Sobchak's advisor on international affairs

[KneelB4Zod!]

Missiles fired from Gaza allegedly caused fire nearby Sedrot, Israel:

#بالفيديو .. اعلام العدو ينشر مشاهد يقول انها للحريق المندلع الآن قرب سديروت بفعل الصواريخ التي اطلقت من #غزة #فلسطين #يونيوز pic.twitter.com/O7LHWlKTlv

— وكالة يونيوز للأخبار (@uunionnews) September 6, 2019

[KneelB4Zod!]

Then the time has come to find Yeltsin's successor. Putin rised straight from the pro-globalist group within Kremlin. Group known as "Kremlin Family". One of the oligarchs, later one of the biggest Putin's enemies, Boris Berezovsky, even runt Putin's election campaign on his private TV ORT (at least I think it was the TV's name). It occured that the campaign was very successful and Putin won the election.

they (Berezovsky, and putin) had disagreements how to share money. not disagreements about politics.

But, let us go back in time to Dec 31, 1999

Yeltsin's Resignation Speech with English Subtitles



Why ? Why did he resigned ?

Who put putin in place to became prime minister and then after yeltsin resignation to become president of russia ?

He was meant as candidate, who will hammer final nails to the coffin of Russia and make it collapse. Instead, the very first thing he've done was change of constitution and, immediately, he started to deal with oligarchs, who worked for the globalists abroad. Immediately this made him dictator, usurper and tyrant in the eyes of western corporate media and governments.

by whome he was created as candidate ? who had enough power to put him in that position ? who had enough power to force Berezovsky to provide propaganda ? who had enough power to force yeltsin to resign ? who had enough power to promise (and keep promise) to yeltsin that he will not be punished ? who had enough power (and influance) to keep Sobchak out of prison ? (In May 1990, Putin was appointed Mayor Sobchak's advisor on international affairs)

you see, russia is big and old country. putin was not some person who got lucky time and the time again and just had what it takes to become president of russia. somebody was taking care of his career and somebody put him in positions that helped him to become president of russia. TPTB do not have that kind of influence in russia.

putin was not supposed to be a president of russia in plans of TPTB. somebody (or group of people) forced yeltsin to resign and put putin on his place. there was no particular reason why yeltsin had to resign. it was not because of health issues. he died in 2007. why did he resign ? his resignation was great surprise to everybody in russia.

In May 1990, Putin was appointed Mayor Sobchak's advisor on international affairs

Yeltsin was incompetent boozer. He was close to death all the time. No one wanted nuclear superpower to be without president if he would die unexpectedly. I don't think there was much more behind it. And, at the end of his era, there was enough very influential people, close to the globalists (or, as you call them TPTB), who were in power to help Putin rise and shine. He was young, he was skilled and he participated on privatization in Russia (yet again - Bush's family projec Hammer if you did not read it yet). But he was, and still is, patriot.
My opinion is that, during his early years, he witnessed what's really going on, how the country is looted and who is behind it. He kept his feelings for himself, as he felt support from the same paople who looted the country, and he took the first chance to deal with them later.
No one can't deny Russia recovery that started immediately after his election. And it's pretty well documented that every single step against western backed oligarchs was pictured as Putin's oppression and tyranny.

They just made a mistake. Worst in their lifes I guess. It can happen even to the greatest villains...

[KneelB4Zod!]

Al-Masdar News
@TheArabSource
·
26 m
#Venezuela deploys air defense missiles Colombian border to ward off potential attack https://aml.ink/SmY7n #Colombia

[KneelB4Zod!]

#UPDATE at least 5 rocket fired from Gaza toward Israel: @IDFSpokesperson;
At least one landed near Sderot (in the video) pic.twitter.com/sRKKl4Gxu2

— Yosef Yisrael (@yosefyisrael25) September 6, 2019

[Zambeezi]

oops

[KneelB4Zod!]

Not sure if he gonna reply but I would like to say "Hi" to Tamonten. Didn't expect you lurking here after such long time, my friend.

[Tamonten]

Not sure if he gonna reply but I would like to say "Hi" to Tamonten. Didn't expect you lurking here after such long time, my friend.

Hi!
Zambeezi managed to drag me in, duh.

Regarding the whole "Who is Mr. Putin" situation, there are several facts and many theories. But personally I believe that documentaries "Putin" (Part 1 and Part 2) and "President" (whole film) are pretty much accurate. Both in depicting what situation was in Russia there and what choices had to be done.
But I also believe that he was guided to the position by some group of highly educated and influential people. One of them may (or may not) be Primakov, who is famous for his U-turn over Atlantic ocean in 1999.

Also, regarding "he's dealing with some evil people"...
It's his work. Literally. He's not some religious leader to refuse meeting with people on the basis of anathema.
His work is to benefit Russia - as people and historical entity. Churchill despised communism, but still was dealing with Soviet Union when he had to. There's even a famous quote on the matter.

And finally - on Russia not helping [...someone...].
In the case Yugoslavia in general and Kosovo in particular Russia was just too weak. But still there was said U-turn and we managed to send paratrooper battalion to Pristina - even if it was mostly symbolic action. BTW, according to some sources, there were two signatures under the order: then-president Yeltsin and... Putin who was the secretary of defense council then. Figuratively, Putin woke Yeltsin in the middle of the night when all his pro-western councilors were asleep and convinced him to sign it.
Libyan matter is... well, a failure. But honest one. I believe that Putin genuinely tried to concentrate on internal affairs and left all international questions in the hands of then-president Medvedev. Not to mention that it was in the course of financial crisis.
Syria... well, I don't see any major failures there. The whole game about "moderate" and "not-so-moderate" militants is certainly annoying, but there's actually nothing new here, since Russia had to deal with similar situations with almost same actors two centuries ago during wars in Caucasus.
But generally... why should Russia actually save everyone? Or anyone? For self-satisfaction? Because there's too little gratitude for spent effort. Whether we look at 19th or 20th century. Or earlier. The best example here is Bulgaria, duh.

[KneelB4Zod!]

Al-Masdar News
@TheArabSource
·
2 m
Asma Assad visits prosthetics center in #Syria's #Tartous https://aml.ink/fYdow #AsmaAssad #BasharAssad



Awesome lady!

[shachalnur]

shachalnur:

You're always welcomed!



Now to your post.

I see it very similary, actually. The most of differences is in terms we each use I think.

I agree that some kind of conflict happened within globaliist club while ago. And, then, division appeared. Rather than Rothschild and Rockefeller I tend to use to say Euro-centric and Amero-centric globalists are in standoff.
Euro-centric globalists, who stand for neo-liberal new world without borders, with destroyed national identities and traditions, want to rule the world from Europe. The are represented, on political stage, by Merkel, Macron or Obama for example.
Contrary Amero-centric globalist group is, actually, neo-colonialist, imperialist group that want to rule the world from the US and maintain the rest of the world as its colony.
It's not needed to say the both ways of new world order would be trully evil and satanic. And yes, I think you can freely replace Euro-centric and Amero-centric term with Rothschild and Rockefeller. As I wrote, it's just terminology.

Only think I can't fully agree on is Israel's position. I didn't see any sign of Israel's attempt to join BRICS. Since begining Israel was in full support of regime change in Syria. This would be quite damaging for Russia. Israel was always behind support for islamic terrorists.
The same terrorists who attack Russia as well. And we should not forget that it was Israel as well, who paved the way for invasion to Iraq. Netanyahu's lies in the fron of US congressmen are well documented.

.

I'll try to keep it shortish.

A euro centric World Order was always the plan(Rothschild)

An amero centric world order?

Not sure that was ever a plan,mainly because the US was ,untill recently , under control from London.

To control and colonialize a country you need control over the money,and that's still rothschild's fiat curreny and Central Banks.

The US ,with mainly Rockefeller's help has been doing Rothschild's(Euro centic Order) dirty work for a century.

I think Rockefeller saw the original plan,the Endgame, going to pieces in 2012,and went for plan B ,that he has been preparing for a long time.

That plan B is mainly to get full control over the USA and americas,in case Rothschild's Grand plan runs into trouble.

They are not really at war,but trying to save what's possible .

Their interests are clashing now ,especially economically and on energy.

The whole oil supply from the middle east is going to be re-organized and europe is in deep doodoo.

and ,ofcourse ,they can always chose to create complete chaos,by crashing economies,releasing virusses or just bomb the crap out of everybody.

so this fight is long from over ,or won.

About Israel:

all the things you said are correct,their role in iraq invasion and long before.

they supported regime change in syria,and gave back-up to jihadists close to the golan.

but something changed in 2012.

Israel didn't join Brics ,but started to make deals with putin an china quickly.

I think think the deal was,more or less:

if Israel wants to face iran ,syria ,hezbollah and whoever else alone because Obama(Rothschild) and NATO f*cked you ,go ahead.

If you want to survive ,we Russia, will protect you ,but you leave lebanon,Syria and Iran alone ,and let us do our job,and after that we'll see.

Israel stuck to that deal for a while,and effectively turned against rothschild in 2012.

But since the Trump psy-op was activated Israel started to become cocky and I suspect they tried to doublecross Putin with this gambit.

it didn't work ,and now Israel is in trouble and Putin is pissed.

The upcoming elections in Israel are risky and are not exactly what they seem.

It's about the man ,bibi,or whatever group prepared and runs this former furniture salesman,his replacements are all the same boring little nazi's,but a lot less powerfull.

Bibi has become too big to fail.

But Adelson is dumping him now,through his wife,

lot's of unpleasant leaks in newspapers.

Bibi is screaming that if he loses,it's because the election was stolen by ... by....by..... the enemy.

Dangerous stuff to shout in paranoid Eugenics Laboratory Ziostan.

Deep State Israel is taking bibi out,but will he go calmly,and will it stay calm there?

I don't think so.

.

[boris]

boris put in Putin

[KneelB4Zod!]

Elijah J. Magnier
@ejmalrai
·
3 h
The border crossing al Bukamal - al Qaem between #Iraq and #Syria is expected to be open in the next 24-48 hours. This will help both countries to regain their commerce and open land travelling.

But above all, it will help supplying Syria with much needed oil

[KneelB4Zod!]

Turkey to start joint patrols on the ground with the USA in YPG-controlled northern Syria. Turkish army has sent soldiers to Akcakale. https://t.co/LbF6cIz1Lf

— Ali Özkök (@Ozkok_A) September 7, 2019

[KneelB4Zod!]

True democracy fighters.. https://t.co/zYIgv1PPRN

— Aldin (@aldin_ww) September 7, 2019

[KneelB4Zod!]

Conflict News
@Conflicts
·
4 m
YEMEN: Houthi medics have claimed that saudi airstrikes that hit a detention centre killed at least 130 people.

https://apnews.com/97991ce36911424ab08a8471b3b79651?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP&utm_campaign=SocialFlow

[KneelB4Zod!]

Quds News Network
@QudsNen
·
19 h
The Palestinian Ministry of Health says more than 2 Palestinians were killed and over 76 others injured by Israeli forces during the #GreatReturnMarch at Gaza border today.

[Zambeezi]

Jizan
Footage shows Yemeni army launching 2 Zilizal-1 missiles at Saudi troops and mercenaries in Jizan



Asir
Military media of the Yemeni army on Friday released video footage shows the missile forces firing zilizal-1 missile at gatherings of Saudi military mechanisms  and mercenaries in Asir region.

UAE reinforcements arrive in Adenhttps://t.co/Y5ij4Vmp0V

— Uprising Today (@uprisingtoday) September 7, 2019

Next uae flag I see I’m burning it

— (@realyemeniah) September 6, 2019